11th hour heroics
It's late, in the 4:30AMs to be exact. I'm half asleep currently, but have found full asleep impossible for the last few hours. I'm not firing on all cylinders. I'm dog-ass-tired, yet jittery. I'm really anxious about the GREs/Grad School/My life. Stress, I think, is the word. If only there was a The Pill for general unease, rather than just unease born of accidental egg fertilization.
I think this strange and unsettling feeling is common in many people. It must come with the part of life that doesn't involve being unemployed in your parent's basement--the part of life I'm not used to. I hope I acclimate quickly.
So I can't sleep. Instead, I'm dialup surfing, researching the Arab-Israeli conflict to get my mind off the unbelievable amount of crap I have to do. I'm reading watchdog reports about ethnic stereotypes in Palestinian and Israeli school books. I'm desperate.
Quiz: If this were a school night and I were still up, it would be because I have to write a paper of some kind on a topic I (A) Haven't read (B) Don't understand (C) Fell asleep through/missed lecture for (D) All of these.The answer is (D). The answer is always (D).
If this were a school night, now would be about the time my brain--in one of the displays of fortitude that I've really come to depend on it for--would be engaging in some 11th hour heroics*. While wonderful, this is usually the only time I can count on my brain for much of anything.
In the larger scheme of things, I suppose I'm more or less at the 11th hour right now as well. I have like a month to wrangle letters of recommendation, take the GRE and maybe the subject test, find schools that do Contemporary Lit, narrow those schools down, apply to those narrowed schools, pay fees, do paperwork, find a job, etc, etc. And I'm also probably going to have to write a 20 page example paper to include with each application. This last thing is of vital importance because it's now painfully clear that my GRE score is going to be several orders of magnitude lower than I'd anticipated.
Shit.
Fitting then, as I sat in bed after tiring of the horrible atrocities being lobbed across a squiggly imaginary line in the desert, that an idea should come to me. An idea for a paper. A paper about a particular movement in contemporary literature.
Sweet.
I wrote this kind of hastily in Word, so it's probably not going to format correctly or make much sense, but here it is (keep reading because I have a question at the end):
Can Magic Realism exist outside the context of the culture that spawned it?I'm including links in case you don't know what any of this is. Wikipedia isn't the best source for defining literary movements, but it's good enough for conceptual work.
Is Garcia-Marquez for Americans a Magic Realist or just a fabulist, a fantasist?
Idea: Taking as a starting point that Magic Realism could not exist without Realism itself, we have to assume that certain broad fundamental assumptions made in the context of Realism do, and in fact must, carry over into Magic Realism.
So, when realism purports to, "concentrate on 'ordinary people', and feature stories either based on, or similar to, real events," we should (should we?) assume that Magic Realism too will concentrate on ordinary people and be based on, if not actual events, then at least 'reality' as it exists for the work's inhabitants.(?)
Certainly, for Morrison, Garcia-Marquez, et al, their characters exist in a world where ghosts, curses, miracles and unfathomably improbable coincidences are not only common, but, have a fantastic power to shape that world.
So, if this is realism, then whose reality is it? Is it a reality that exists only in the literature itself, or does it also exist in the mind/culture of the Author? If the former, can it even really be called realism at all; if the latter, can anyone outside the mind/culture in which the book is written truly consider it realism?
If it exists only on paper then is it just fantasy? If it exists solely in an isolated culture, with there be/are there barriers to understanding by other cultures who do not share that fundamental reality?
Basically: Can you understand a work of Magic Realism AS a work of Magic Realism if you have no link/connection to the reality from which it is created? Consider someone (Oprah's Book Clubbers, myself) who doesn't know Macondo, who doesn't live the folklore, who doesn't see ghosts, who isn't steeped in just that reality, can that someone call it realism, or is it just fantasy?
Is Magic Realism even supposed to portray reality as it actually is? Riddle me this.
I'm not so much interested in defining a movement as I am in exploring the way that movement impacts upon the perception of reality, or rather, how the reality of a book is affected by the reader's orientation to that reality.
YOUR TASK:
Comment, please. Anyone (Aleah especially) who has some insight into Magic Realism as a genre or anyone (Alphabetically: Don, Mike, Omni) who might have some ideas about collective perception and group reality are encouraged, nay implored, to voice your opinions.
And for God's sake cite sources.
*11th hour heroics are similar to 4th quarter heroics. 11th hour heroics, however, have more loosely defined temporal constraints and lack any athleticism at all.
3 Comments:
1. Typically the only way I get near the top of a list is through my amazing alphabetism. Go "D"!
2. I won't cite sources because this is off the top of my usually dizzy head.
From what I understand of folklore, oral tradition, etc., my first response to your question is that in cultures that accept "magic" or "superstition" as an important component of their existence, perhaps "magic realism" as a literary concept does NOT exist. Unreal events or forces already are perceived to alter and effect daily real life in their world. Meaning, if an author like Gabriel Garcia-Marquez speaks to the already accepted realities of a culture, he's really just reenforcing the sensibilities of that culture.
Conversely the same author's work as read by Americans would be, in fact, magic realism, because (genericly and broadly) in "American Culture" his works show otherwise unreal forces to tangibly affect the world.
There's my first lob, I'm really trying to pay attention to the Charger game, dammit.
Oh, and Luke, please stop bolting upright at 4 a.m. There will be PLENTY of time for that when you hit 38 years of age. Write a list of the stuff you're going to do tomorrow, don't be overly ambitious with, and go back to sleep. Remember the two rules: 1. Don't sweat the little shit. 2. Everything's little shit.
It seems to me like the answer to your question is steeped in the presentation of the work itself. Never having read a work of magical realism, I'm having a hard time imagining where on the scale it would fall between realism and fantasy. That doesn't help, but I don't really have the background to intelligengly answer your question. Sorry.
--Mike Sheffler
... turning to the 3-D map, we see an unmistakable cone of ignorance
Okay, so, I don't think I'm going to be terribly helpful, as Magical Realism is not my area of expertise per se, and I've studied more theatre than literature, and also because all I have for you is more questions (although sometimes lots of questions and no answers in a scholarly paper can help you reach that level of pretentiousness that all lit majors aspire to, right?).
So, first of all, you should go check out I Heart Huckabees. It doesn't have a terrible lot to do with anything, but it does deal with reality and your perception of it, and besides, when you hate it, as you almost certainly will, your scathing critique will probably make Mike cry, and I like that.
My first question is when does realism become heightened reality become magical realism? Take TV, for example. Are reality shows reality? What about a quality realistic scripted show, like CSI. It could be considered 'realism'. But take Sports Night or The West Wing - both by Aaron Sorkin, who writes what I would call 'heightened reality'. In other words, the characters on his shows are unnaturally intelligent and speak as though, well, they had read the script in advance. So while the dialogue is certainly miraculous, I don't imagine it would be considered a miracle. So the West Wing is not magical realism, but it is not realism either. Yet it is still enjoyed by people outside its 'culture' (although maybe not, as I can't imagine many republicans enjoy it, but they can nevertheless understand it).
Second question: If magical realism is perceived by those outside itself as fantasy and not realism, why isn't all fiction perceived as fantasy? It's just as fake. When I read a realistic book by a foreign author, I still see it as realism even though it's not my reality. I trust the author to truthfully represent their reality and I buy it. So then do I think miracles happen all the time in South America but never here? No, I suppose not. So back to square one.
Finally, I do have some quotes for you, from a (gasp) verifiable source! Like I mentioned earlier, I have more experience with Surrealism, and theatre, but I do think this is relevant. So this is from the introduction to a short play called "Les maries de la Tour Eiffel" by a French surrealist named Jean Cocteau, written in 1922.
"Every work of the poetic order contains what Gide, in his preface to Paludes, so aptly calls 'God's part'. This 'part', which eludes the poet himself, holds surprises for him. A certain phrase, a certain gesture, which seemed to mean as little to him as the concept of the third dimension to a painter, has a hidden meaning which everyone will interpret for himself. The true symbol is never foreseen: it emerges by itself, as long as the bizarre, the unreal, do not enter into the reckoning.
In a fairy land, the fairies do not appear. They walk invisibly there. They can appear to mortals only in natural circumstances. The unsophisticated mind sees fairies more easily than others, for it will not oppose the marvelous with the resistance of hardheadedness."
Cocteau's goal for this work is to "rejuvenate the commonplace. Surrealism is about seeing everything that is real, but never forgetting that is is always extraordinary. Nothing is commonplace unless you decide it is. So what is realism but what we should escape, and what is magical realism but where we go to rejuvenate reality? And yes, I realise that this has very little to do with your question, sorry, it's all I got.
Here's my favorite line from the play: "Since these mysteries are beyond me, let's pretend we're organizing them." Pretty good motto for a writer of literature analysis, eh? Sorry this is so long and rather off topic, hope it helps.
--Aleah
Post a Comment
<< Home